Like a broken record…

User Avatar

by Clance' McClannahan, Special To NASCAR commentary,NASCAR video,NASCAR pictures, Bench Racing With Steve and Charlie

Clance' McClannahan, famous author behind The Church of The Great Oval and also one of the much appreciated Contributing Authors at Thunder Lounge.

February 26, 2010 8:40 pm CST 1 Comment

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!


Dear Bruton Smith,

You have more money than God. Please fix the traffic coming in and out of the track. In fact, could you just fix it in all of Las Vegas? The wait at the airport sucks too. Wayne Newton would do it for his fans, I bet.

Love,

All of us that make you have more money than God.

P.S. Good job with the track. It’s really fast! The traffic may be worth it, if the race is as good as qualifying was. Too bad we missed 10 driver’s attempts, including Kurt Busch beating Jeff Gordon who beat out Dale Earnhardt Jr. for the pole.

But that wasn’t your fault.

Old School Racing Thanks to Jimmy Watts

User Avatar

by Charlie Turner

I'm Charlie Turner co-host of the syndicated, mostly NASCAR radio show On Pit Row. Thanks for stopping by OnPitRow.com and the Bench Racing with Steve and Charlie blog. Oh yeah, Steve is an idiot. Follow me on Twitter @onpitrow

March 12, 2009 1:07 pm CDT 6 Comments

Can you use Jocko Flocko, Bruton Smith and Jimmy Watts all in one sentence? I didn’t think so. But Mindy Monday tried, in the latest episode of the Monday Morning Crew Chief.

Mindy even has a NASCAR trivia question for you fans of such stuff.

There’s that, assorted brain farts and how not to win fans and influence holiday giving. Watch it all right here on Bench Racing TV.

Will Bobby Labonte Replace Ticketmaster

User Avatar

by Steve Wronkowicz

I am co-host of the syndicated radio show: ON PIT ROW. Charlie likes to call me an "idiot". I'm not an "idiot"; I just prefer not to let the facts get in the way of my opinions.

February 3, 2009 8:17 am CST No Comments

During the NASCAR Media Tour, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. president Bruton Smith and most of his companies promoters have called on drivers to help sell tickets.

Whether Smith is looking for Tony Stewart, Jeff Gordon or Junior to spend some time in the ticket booth or just to present a more “fan-friendly” face to the fans; NASCAR is scrambling to fill seats.  It has been a long time since many tracks have had to hustle to get its tickets sold.  For over a decade the line from Field of Dreams held true; “Build it and they will come.”

Well this isn’t a corn field in Iowa and tracks are struggling to have their races look full to the television cameras.  But if you were a former ticket owner at a particular track who had not purchased tickets this year; would you change your mind if you recieved a phone call from Kasey Kahne asking you to re-up?  Would you venture off to Darlington if you thought Bobby Labonte might be at the ticket window?

Do fans feel slighted by NASCAR’s elite drivers?  The truth is that most fans believe that the majority of NASCAR personalities are quite accessable and give their time as much as possible.  Fans line the walkways to and from the garage area at all tracks hoping to get a look at and maybe an autograph from, their favorite driver.  Those drivers more times than not will take time to sign something or otherwise interact with the fans.

Rarely are those fans critical of the driver for not doing more.  And that leads us to this weeks BUZZ ON PIT ROW:

Should NASCAR drivers be expected to do more to help track owners and promoters sell tickets?

Let us know what you think and we may use your response on this weeks radio show.  Tune in to ON PIT ROW, Tuesdays from 5-7pm ET at www.onpitrow.com Give us a call and let us know what you think about THE BUZZ or anything NASCAR at 1-877-502-8255 during the show.

photo credit: Icon Sports Media

How To Fix NASCAR: 1. Trim the Schedule

User Avatar

by Chris Leone, Special To NASCAR commentary,NASCAR video,NASCAR pictures, Bench Racing With Steve and Charlie

If OnPitRow.com was a NASCAR team, I’d be the development driver of the bunch. In the same way that young hotshots like Joey Logano have been driving since they were in grade school, I’ve been following and writing about all forms of motorsports since I was barely old enough to talk.

December 2, 2008 7:51 pm CST 7 Comments

Hey, everybody. I’ve been somewhat out of commission the past few weeks, what with being sick and college applications and all. But now I’m back, and as promised, am starting my mini-thesis paper on how to fix our beloved NASCAR.

The plan is for me to do these entries bi-weekly, so they’ll (hopefully) be a little more substantial than, say, Quick Hits usually is (or isn’t). This is a series of articles on how one fan thinks that the sanctioning body can return the sport to its glory days of the mid-1990s.

Without further ado:

Since NASCAR became a sport with regular national television coverage - start the timeline at the 1979 Daytona 500 on CBS - the sport has jumped from 28 to 36 races on the Sprint Cup schedule. (Granted, 1979 featured 31 races, but the low was 28 events in 1985.) With so many more opportunities to watch races on TV, it should be no surprise that 18 races (half of the schedule!) experienced either losses or no gain in TV ratings compared to last season.

It’s also no surprise that tracks like Texas Motor Speedway and Auto Club Speedway (formerly California Speedway) have seen “declining” attendance since the addition of second race dates at both tracks. Eddie Gossage, president of TMS, even admitted earlier this year that ticket sales at his track were flat.

(A quick note on the quotes on “declining” - this doesn’t necessarily mean that the tracks have seen less people going through the turnstiles. It just means that they have failed to sell out any of their races since being awarded second dates. In other words, while the demand for second races may have been substantial, and those second race weekends may have made sense at the time, it’s not as if either track could have filled every seat based on waiting lists and season ticket holders alone.)

The simple and obvious solution here is to get rid of a handful of races - enough to, as Dale Earnhardt Jr. suggests, “keep (the fans) wanting more.”

“We have saturated the market with race after race after race,” he told Yahoo! Sports in November. “When we were a 28-race schedule, the sport was giving you just enough to get really get excited about the next season.”

At the same time, it’s going to be pretty expensive for teams to schlep out their big and fancy 18-wheelers across the country next year as it is, so some of the events that are way across the country also put a big hurt on owners’ wallets.

So let’s have a look at the 2009 Sprint Cup schedule, shall we? Currently, it has only four off weekends: March 15, April 12 (Easter), July 18, and August 30. Compare that to 1992, when there were off weekends in almost every month: February 23, March 22, April 19, May 10, June 28, July 12, August 23, October 18, and November 8.

Eliminating the second Texas race (November 8) and the second Auto Club race (October 11) are easy enough, but where to from there? It’d be bad to have two off weekends right next to each other. The trick, then, is to find redundant races that clutter up large stretches on the schedule.

Pocono doesn’t need two races, much less two 500-mile events, but one of those races is two weeks after an existing off weekend, so the June 7 date should face the axe.

Both of Atlanta’s race dates are around off weekends, but there’s a track that doesn’t need more than one. The spring Nationwide race is gone, so why keep the Cup race (March 8)? But instead of having two off weekends in a row, it’d be easy to set in the Richmond race scheduled for May 2. Richmond has had an early season race before (namely… March 8, 1992), so it’s not as if there’s a huge adjustment.

Now, for the most difficult cut of all for me personally… the June 28 race at New Hampshire. I hate to do it, but the track does nothing for anyone. NASCAR lost two budding superstars (Kenny Irwin Jr. and Adam Petty) up here, and it’s the furthest north track on the schedule. It’s just not necessary to have two Cup races there.

Cut number six goes to the August 16 race at Michigan, because the only cars that ever seem to win there either belong to Jack Roush, Ray Evernham, or Roger Penske. Until Earnhardt Jr.’s win in June, a Chevrolet hadn’t seen victory lane at Michigan since Jeff Gordon won in June 2001.

So there you have it: six cuts to the Sprint Cup schedule to bring the schedule to ten off weekends and 32 total races (including the Budweiser Shootout and Sprint All-Star Challenge). The racing would be better, the TV ratings would rise, the fans would fight for tickets again, and the owners would save six more weeks’ worth of gas money. (Of course, we’d cut races in Nationwide and Camping World Trucks too, but I’ll fix those series later.)

As for the track owners? The IndyCar Series is going to hit its stride come the new chassis and engine package in 2010. I know Bruton Smith’s looking to bring them to a couple of his tracks anyway. Everybody wins!

Say Good-bye to the Single-Track Teams

User Avatar

by Steve Wronkowicz

I am co-host of the syndicated radio show: ON PIT ROW. Charlie likes to call me an "idiot". I'm not an "idiot"; I just prefer not to let the facts get in the way of my opinions.

May 23, 2008 6:33 am CDT 5 Comments

Reports out of Charlotte have Speedway Motorsports Inc. buying Kentucky Speedway.

Untitled PostAmy Henderson at The Frontstretch reports that Bruton Smith, has said he will have a Cup date at the track in northern Kentucky in the 2009 season. Next year? A Cup race? Where will that Cup race come from? Smith’s company has recently purchased New Hampshire Speedway from the Bahre family and taking a race from there is a possibility.

There is still the nagging lawsuit that is hanging over NASCAR and Kentucky Speedway. Could that lawsuit result in SMI wrestling a date away from NASCAR owned International Speedway Corp.? The ISC track that should lose a date would be California, but don’t look for NASCAR to pull out of that TV market no matter how pathetic the attendance is. NASCAR wants big TV markets and their aren’t many bigger than the LA area.

Its time for NASCAR to take a hard look at their schedule and determine where the best 36 places are to hold their premier events. Take races from venues that cannot support them and move them to locales that have and will drive butts into seats and in front of TV sets. Henderson speculates that the purchase of Pocono by SMI could pave the way for a date to be moved from that track to Kentucky. Pocono has more of a problem holding exciting races than filling the grandstands. Drivers and teams could get behind going to Pocono only once during the year.

As much of a burr under NASCAR’s saddle as the previous ownership at Kentucky has been can you imagine what adding the SMI /ISC dynamic will bring to the table? Look for a quick solution to the problem though. NASCAR doesn’t like doing battle with Smith because they know it is a lose-lose situation. Smith has a way of getting what he wants at NASCAR’s expense. For the fans of northern Kentucky this could be the best thing ever to bring them a long sought after Cup event.

At the same time it would eliminate the racetrack from much of the testing that Cup teams do at the track. Without having a Cup date currently, it is open for testing whenever teams want to use it. So would one Cup race a year bring a larger financial impact than many open testing sessions? By most accounts one date on the schedule could make the year financially. While hosting Nationwide Series and Craftsman Truck Series races are currently the highlight of Kentucky’s season, they pale in comparison to what a Cup event could bring.

Let the wrangling begin. This should be fun to watch.

photo credit: Icon Sports Media

Soliciting Solutions for Boring Racing - a Contest

User Avatar

by Charlie Turner

I'm Charlie Turner co-host of the syndicated, mostly NASCAR radio show On Pit Row. Thanks for stopping by OnPitRow.com and the Bench Racing with Steve and Charlie blog. Oh yeah, Steve is an idiot. Follow me on Twitter @onpitrow

May 3, 2008 6:34 am CDT 7 Comments

Soliciting Solutions for Boring Racing - a ContestTo paraphrase one of my favorite lines all-time from a racing movie…

“Pete, do you ever get tired of (substitute “bored with”) the racing? Lately, sometimes I get very tired.” (ditto)

Ferrari driver Jean Pierre Sarti to Yamura pilot Pete Aaron in “Grand Prix”.

As popular as NASCAR is, people are never satisfied. That’s probably good. Mike Mulhern has a proposition to make things more exciting…

A simple proposition – give one bonus point for each lap a driver leads. If a man leads 150 laps at Daytona, he gets 150 bonus points, for example.
Or perhaps, considering tracks are different lengths, give one bonus point for each mile a driver leads.

Mike contends, and I agree, that putting all of that value on leading laps would make for much more competitive racing for the lead. More lead passes - more exciting races.

That’s what he thinks. What about you? How would you spice up Cup racing?

Put your suggestion in the comment section and I’ll pick a favorite or two and send those people a copy of “Daytona 500: 50 Years of the Great American Race” from A&E Daytona 500: 50 years of the great American raceHome Video.

Our last contest was won by the Reverend Jim. Don’t let him win again.

March Madness

Play the Rattles from the Catch Can contest

Blogroll

Fantasy Sports Partners

Racing Websites

ON PIT ROW at RaceTalkRadio
Backstretch Boys: 30% Off New CD!
Jayski's: See what the buzz is about.

We've got your game.

Advertisement